Saturday, November 29, 2008
Thursday, November 27, 2008
funny phots
After the collapse of the US dollar, America circulated the New US $
if statue of liberty was in india
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Saturday, November 22, 2008
vinayakudu cinema review
| Vinayakudu - A Big Time Entertainer |
 |
 There is nothing like or above Love in the creation of god says a poet. It is an integral part of our life. It is defined in various ways by numerous people. For some wealth is a constraint for love, others it may be poverty or physical beauty. A pure heart is what needed for true love, other things are all trivial – says 'Vinayakudu'. Prem Movies banner, which earlier presented the feel good film 'Aa Naluguru', has made this movie in the direction of Sai Kiran Adavi, an associate of Shekhar Kammula, and is produced by Saritha Patra. 'Vinayakudu' which is based on sensitive emotions is releasing on 22nd. Here we present a review. Story Karthik (Krishnudu) lives in Rajolu. He meets Madhavi (Vahida), a resident of Hyderabad, through an internet chat room. They become friends with out meeting each other in person. Karthik comes to Hyderabad to meet Madhavi. He stays at his sister Aparna’s home (Satya Krishnan) who lives with her family in a colony in Hyderabad. One fine day, he goes to meet Madhavi. But in a twist of fate, the crush didn’t last long. Madhavi gets shocked by seeing his appearance and makes her move pretending that she is not Madhavhi but a friend of hers. Later, by his friend Altaf’s help (Surya Teja) Karthik gets a job in the creative department of Reliance Mobile Company. There he comes across Kalpana (Sonia) with whom he falls at love in first sight itself. She is a girl with specific ideas on life. She starts liking Karthik, but never reveals her love to him. Did Karthik who loved Kalpana at first sight, expressed his love to her? What were the consequences? How it all ended? Watch this big time entertainer on the big screen. Artists' performance  Sonia who was appreciated for her role as Shravs in 'Happy Days' exhibited good performance as a solo heroine in this film. She could be applauded for presenting sensitive emotions very well in some sequences. Krishnudu who was popular with 'Happy Days' has bought the character Karthik to life. As the subject is suitable to his physique, never he seems to be acting in the role. In every scene, he exhibited apt expressions and justifies the role of 'Vinayakudu' cent-per-cent. He has literally lived out the character. Action of Poonam Kaur as Sandy, Surya Teja as Altaf is good. To be specific, Surya Teja has exhibited much ease in performing his character. Satya Krishnan as Karthik's sister does good. Similarly, Ankith, Adarsh and Murali Krishna have emoted within the limits of their characters. After a long gap, actress Tulasi does a role in this film. Presenter Premkumar Patra, director Sai Kiran Adivi and cameraman PG Vinda appears on screen in short sequences. Work of the Crew Although, this is his first film, Sam Prasan has composed good music with notable songs. An experiment done in re-recording for some scenes is quite appealing. A little more effort in re-recording would have been appreciated. PG Vinda, who did the cinematography for 'Grahanam', 'Nandana Vanam 120km' including the recent release 'Ashta Chamma', did his part perfectly and rendered good photography to the scenes in this movie. He used close-ups in most of the scenes which adds beauty to the demeanors. Editing by Marthand K Venkatesh need not be praised for he is the best of all. He has done his job to the point of perfection with his scissors. The rest of the members of the technical divisions have delivered good team work.  Directors Portrayal Sai Kiran Adivi an associate of Shekhar Kammula, made this feel good entertainer as his first venture in direction, and exhibited his nifty taste. In presenting the story and screenplay, he seldom fails in narration and doesn’t miss the tempo anywhere. The punch dialogues that are satirical written by Sai have been timed correctly to the mark. Shekhar Kammula’s factory has presented another new talented director to the industry in the form of Sai Kiran Adivi. Cons In this feel good entertainer, the incorporation of Ankitha's character which is more villainy does not appeal the crowd. Quite a nice feel good movie yet its target upon the niche audience is a strong disappointment. The characters lag at certain places to associate themselves with audiences of different strata. If made in a more general tone, the movie might have reached the masses in entirety. Criticism For Pure love, physical beauty is not important, only the purity in love is needed, with this beautiful message as the theme the film 'Vinayakudu' has made. What could have been a feel good entertainer for the entire crowd lags behind for it has been made pointedly for the corporate audiences. It would have been even better if it was made for everyone. But still on a whole, the debutant director Sai Kiran has hit the bull’s eye almost with his very first venture. A big fat love story is quite a big time entertainer! Released on: November 22, 2008 |
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
ramcharn-deerudu leak videos link
Ramcharan-Deerudu Leak Video-1
http://english.meetelugu.com/index.php?option=com_hwdvideoshare&task=viewvideo&Itemid=84&video_id=65 Ramcharan-Deerudu Leak Video-2
http://english.meetelugu.com/index.php?option=com_hwdvideoshare&task=viewvideo&Itemid=84&video_id=64kamalhasan marudhannayagam video
http://english.meetelugu.com/index.php?option=com_hwdvideoshare&task=viewvideo&Itemid=84&video_id=66
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Friday, November 14, 2008
Surya son of Krishnan Movie Review
Story : The film opens with the death of Krishnan(Surya old) and his son Major Surya ( Surya) at a mission in the Indian air force.The film shows the transformation of
teenager Surya into a Man,the bonding between father&son ,the ups and downs of Surya's life and his father's love,support for the son & the everlasting infulence on him.
Highlights :
Surya is awesome.the way he lived the charecters,the way he moulded him self as a teenager,a loverboy,a well built army person& above all a 60year old dad shows his
love & commitment to his job.Surya s/o Krishnan is definitely his best performance till date.
Writer&Director Gautam Vasudev Menon did a commendable job .He just transformed a common man's life onto the celluloid.There are many moments any of us can
identify ourselves with the charecters on screen.
Music( Harris Jayaraj) , Makeup ( Bhanu,Yogesh) are good.
Camera (Ratnavelu),Editing(Anthony) are neat.Art by Rajeevan is worth mentioning (especially the vintage look is good )
Simran (as old lady),Sameera Reddy,Divya Spandana are adequate.
The film has style,poetic love episodes,cool music & touching emotions and at times you cannot ignore the tamil flavour & very formal scenes within the family.
Sidelights :
The film is very slow.the sluggish pace &,length can drag down your opinion from bagundhi to bane undhi.
Narrative style ( hero narrating the entire story,sitting in the copter, to his dad who is no more) won't go well with our audience.
Public Talk : Good but slow,Worth watching if you have got some patience.
Industry Talk :Ok in A centers .But won't work in other areas.
teenager Surya into a Man,the bonding between father&son ,the ups and downs of Surya's life and his father's love,support for the son & the everlasting infulence on him.
Highlights :
Surya is awesome.the way he lived the charecters,the way he moulded him self as a teenager,a loverboy,a well built army person& above all a 60year old dad shows his
love & commitment to his job.Surya s/o Krishnan is definitely his best performance till date.
Writer&Director Gautam Vasudev Menon did a commendable job .He just transformed a common man's life onto the celluloid.There are many moments any of us can
identify ourselves with the charecters on screen.
Music( Harris Jayaraj) , Makeup ( Bhanu,Yogesh) are good.
Camera (Ratnavelu),Editing(Anthony) are neat.Art by Rajeevan is worth mentioning (especially the vintage look is good )
Simran (as old lady),Sameera Reddy,Divya Spandana are adequate.
The film has style,poetic love episodes,cool music & touching emotions and at times you cannot ignore the tamil flavour & very formal scenes within the family.
Sidelights :
The film is very slow.the sluggish pace &,length can drag down your opinion from bagundhi to bane undhi.
Narrative style ( hero narrating the entire story,sitting in the copter, to his dad who is no more) won't go well with our audience.
Public Talk : Good but slow,Worth watching if you have got some patience.
Industry Talk :Ok in A centers .But won't work in other areas.
india win 1st one day match of india vs england
యువరాజ్ సింగ్ చెలరేగి ఆడడంతో రాజ్కోట్లోని మాధవరాజ్ సింథ్యా మైదానంలో పరుగుల వరద పారింది. కేవలం 78 బంతుల్లో 138 పరుగులతో నాటౌట్గా నిలిచిన యువరాజ్ భారత్ భారీ స్కోరు సాధించడంలో ప్రధాన పాత్ర పోషించాడు. దీంతో తొలుత బ్యాటింగ్ చేసిన భారత్ నిర్ణీత 50 ఓవర్లలో ఐదు వికెట్ల నష్టానికి 387 పరుగులు భారీ స్కోరు నమోదు చేసింది. వన్డేలో భారత్ కు ఇది అత్యధిక స్కోర్. యువరాజ్కు తోడు ఓపెనర్లు సెహ్వాగ్ (85), గంభీర్ (51)లు సైతం ఇంగ్లాండ్ బౌలర్లపై విరుచుకుపడ్డారు. ధోనీ (39), రైనా (43)లు సైతం ఇంగ్లాండ్ బౌలర్లకు చుక్కలు చూపారు. అదే సమయంలో ఇంగ్లాండ్ బౌలర్లలో హార్మిసన్, పటేల్లు చెరో రెండు వికెట్లు సాధించగా ఫ్లింటాఫ్ ఒక వికెట్ తీశాడు.
ఏడు వన్డేల సిరీస్లో భాగంగా జరిగిన ఈ తొలి వన్డేలో టాస్ గెలిచిన ఇంగ్లాండ్ ఫీల్డింగ్ ఎంచుకుంది. దీంతో తొలుత బ్యాటింగ్ ప్రారంభించిన భారత్కు ఓపెనర్లు గంభీర్, సెహ్వాగ్లు శుభారంభానిచ్చారు. ధాటిగా ఆడిన ఈ జంట తొలి వికెట్కు 127 పరుగులు జోడించింది. ఈ దశలో పటేల్ బౌలింగ్లో షా పట్టిన క్యాచ్తో అర్థ సెంచరీ చేసిన గంభీర్ (51) పెవిలియన్ బాట పట్టాడు. అటుపై క్రీజులోకి వచ్చిన రైనాతో కలిసి సెహ్వాగ్ తన ధాటిని కొనసాగించాడు. వీరిద్దరు కలిసి రెండో వికెట్కు 26 పరుగులు జోడించారు. ఈ దశలో అర్ధ సెంచరీ పూర్తి చేసి మంచి ఊపు మీదున్న సెహ్వాగ్ (85)ను పటేల్ ఔట్ చేశాడు. అనంతరం క్రీజులోకి వచ్చిన యువరాజ్ సింగ్ ప్రారంభం నుంచి తన ధాటిని కొనసాగించాడు. వెన్ను నొప్పి కారణంగా నడుముకు బెల్ట్ కట్టుకుని క్రీజులోకి వచ్చిన యువరాజ్ ఇంగ్లాండ్ బౌలర్ల భరతం పట్టాడు. అయితే అర్థ సెంచరీకి దగ్గరవుతున్న దశలో రైనా (43) ఫ్లింటాఫ్ బౌలింగ్లో మూడో వికెట్గా క్రీజు నుంచి నిష్ర్కమించాడు. అటుపై క్రీజులోకి వచ్చిన కెప్టెన్ ధోనీ (39) సైతం హర్మిసన్ బౌలింగ్లో వెనుతిరిగాడు. చివరగా యువరాజ్తో కలిసి రోహిత్ శర్మ (11) నాటౌట్గా నిలిచాడు.
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
pearl harbor bombing - real phots
The attack on Pearl Harbor was a surprise military strike conducted by the Japanese navy against the United States' naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on the morning of Sunday December 7, 1941, later resulting in the United States becoming militarily involved in World War II. It was intended as a preventive action to keep the U.S. Pacific Fleet from influencing the war Japan was planning to wage in Southeast Asia against Britain, the Netherlands, and the United States. The attack consisted of two aerial attack waves totaling 353 aircraft, launched from six Japanese aircraft carriers.
The attack sank four U.S. Navy battleships (two of which were raised and returned to service late in the war) and damaged four more. The Japanese also sank or damaged three cruisers, three destroyers, and one minelayer, destroyed 188 aircraft, and caused personnel losses of 2,402 killed and 1,282 wounded. The power station, shipyard, maintenance, and fuel and torpedo storage facilities, as well as the submarine piers and headquarters building (also home of the intelligence section) were not hit. Japanese losses were minimal, at 29 aircraft and five midget submarines, with 65 servicemen killed or wounded.
Monday, November 10, 2008
tajmahal -history behind tajmahal
The interior water well
Frontal view of the Taj Mahal and dome
Close up of the dome with pinnacle
View of sealed doors & windows in back
Typical Vedic style corridors
The Music House--a contradiction
A locked room on upper floor
A marble apartment on ground floor
Staircase that leads to the lower levels
300 foot long corridor inside apartments
One of the 22 rooms in the secret lower level
Interior of one of the 22 secret rooms
Interior of another of the locked rooms
Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room
Huge ventilator sealed shut with bricks
Secret walled door that leads to other rooms
Secret bricked door that hides more evidence
Palace in Barhanpur where Mumtaz died
Pavilion where Mumtaz is said to be buried
NOW READ THIS.......
No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the
whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says
the
Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of
Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course of his research O
ak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from
then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court ch ronicle,
Badshahnama,
Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra
was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur
still
retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for
surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a
burial place for
dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.
For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried
in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says
the term " Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries
from Afghanisthan to Algeria . "The unusual explanation that the term Taj
Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ," he writes.
Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's
name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he
claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace .. Oak
also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale cre ated
by
court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists Not a
single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.
Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates
Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by
Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a
few
samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed
that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan
Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's
death), describes the life of the city in his memoirs. But he makes no
reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an
English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the
Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.
Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies
that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple
rather
than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed
since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public . Oak
asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects
commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples Fearing political
backlash, Indira Gandhi's government t ried to have Prof. Oak's book
withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the
first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit or
validate Oak's research.
The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Ma hal under
U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.
Do circulate this to all you know and let them know about this reality.....
Inda win the Test Match
@ãLP»RsNRPV ª«P§§ãLPcRsv C ª«Pãwù¿ºs »ÜÖs L¯ÍÇsÙ©«s ÊnØLRP»Rs ÇsÈísv ZãNQP|mís©ºs ª«P§}¤sQãLPúcRs zqsãLPgºs cn]ͬds ÈØ£qs lgPÖsÀs ª«P§§ãLPcRsvgS ÊØùÈÓsãLPgºs©«sv FPãLP¿RPvNRPV©SõƒRsv. »ÜÖs B¬PõãLPgºQ=ÌÜÍ ÊnØLRP»ºs 441 xmsLRPvgRPvÌsv, lLPãLPƒ¯Í B¬PõãLPgºQ=ÌÜÍ 295 xmsLRPvgRPvÌsv Û¿QËÍzqsãLPcTs. cUs¬sNTP xqsª«PãwcnS©«sãLPgS A}qísûÖs¸RPãw ÇsÈísv »ÜÖs B¬PõãLPgºQ=ÌÜÍ 355, lLPãLPƒ¯Í B¬PõãLPgºQ=ÌÜÍ 209 xmsLRPvgRPvÌsv ª«Pãwú»Rs®ªPͧ Û¿QËÍzqs AÌ‘È£s @LiVVãLPcTs. cUs¬s»ÜÍ ÊnØLRP»ºs 172 xmsLRPvgRPvÌs ÊnØLkjs AcnTsNRPùãLP»ÜÍ ©SÌsvg¯Í ÂÈQP£qís©«sv, ®ªP§§»RsòãLP {qsLkjs£qs©«sv r~ãLP»RsãLP Û¿QËÍxqsvNRPVãLPcTs. 1980 »RsLRPvªS»Rs A}qísûÖs¸RPãw©«sv INRP ÂÈQP£qís {qsLkjs£qsÌÜÍ ÊnØLRP»ºs 2 — 0 Û»QË̓S»ÜÍ ª«P§ÈÓís NRPLjszmsãLP¿RsƒRsãLP BZcËÍQ úxms´Rsª«P§ãLP.
A}qísûÖs¸RPãw ÇsÈísv lLPãLPƒ¯Í B¬PõãLPg¯Í=Q”s ª«Pãw´RsWù }¤sQlƒP©ºs 93 ÊsãLP»RsvÌsv FPcRsvL¯ä¬s 77, \|qQsª«P§©ºs NRPÈÓs¿ºs 16 ÊsãLP»RsvÌ”ÜÍ 16 xmsLRPvgRPvÌsv Û¿QËÍaSLRPv. BNRP @NRPäƒTs ©«svãLPÀs A}qísûÖs¸RPãw ÊØùÈ£Q=®ªP§©ºs FPª«sLRPw NRPVcRsvLRPvgS ‚sZãNQPÈ”s ª«scRôs ¬sÌsÊsƒRsÛÌQËÍNRP, ÊnØLRP»Rs Ê‘ÌsLR”s ÊsãLP»RsvÌsNRPV xqsª«PãwcnS©«sãLP ¿PxmQöÛÌQËÍNRP »RP*LRP»RP*LRPgSZ©ËÍQ |mP‚sÖs¸RP§©ºsNRPV Û¿QËÍLjsF¡¸RPãwLRPv. A{qs£qs ZãNQP|mís©ºs LjsNUP FyãLPÈÓsãLPgºs 8, \ZªP§ÛÆÁÍÌ£s N”SLºPä 22, \ZªP§ÛÆÁÍÌ£s x¤Qs}qs= 19, }ts©ºs ªSÈQ=©ºs 9, úÊ؃ºs x¤QsƒTïs©ºs 4, ÇØxqs©ºs úZãNQPÇØ 4, úÂÊQPÈ£s Öds 0, ‚P§ÂÈQQèÌ£s ÇØ©«Q=©ºs 11 xmsLRPvgRPvÌsv Û¿QËÍzqs lªP©«svcTsLjsgSLRPv. NS®ªP§LRPw©ºs \ZªsÈ£s 49 ÊsãLP»RsvÌsv FPcRsvL¯ä¬s 26 xmsLRPvgRPvÌsv Û¿QËÍzqs ©SÈ‘È£s ÊØùÈ£Q=ª«P§©ºsgS ¬sÖs¿SƒRsv.
©SÌsvg¯Í ª«Pãwù¿ºsÌÜÍ ®ªP§§»RsòãLP lLPãLPƒRsv B¬PõãLPgºQ=ÌÜÍ©«sW NRPÖszms 12 ‚sZãNQPÈ”sv †dszqs©«s A}qísûÖs¸RPãw Ê‘ÌsLºs ÇØxqs©ºs úZãNQPÇØ ª«Pãwù©ºs A£mns cTs ª«Pãwù¿ºs @ªSLïRPv @ãLPcRsvNRPV©SõƒRsv. úZãNQPÇØ »Rs©«s »ÜÖs {qsLkjs£qsÌÜÍZ©ËÍQ @ªSLïRPv lgPÌsv¿RPvN¯Íª«sƒRsãLP ‚sZaËÍQxtsãLP. ÊÜÍLRïsLºs — gRPªSxqPäLºs ÂÈQP£qís ª«Pãwù¿ºs {qsLkjs£qs ®ªP§§»RsòãLPgS @»RPùãLP»Rs D»Rsòª«P§ úxms†sÊnÏs©«sv úxmscRsLjP+ãLPÀs 15 ‚sZãNQPÈ”sv xmsƒRsg¯ÈÓís©«s ÊnØLRP»Rs Ê‘ÌsLºs BuSãLP»ºs aRsLRQø ª«Pãwù©ºs A£mns cTs {qsLkjs£qs @ªSLïRPvgS ÈÜ…¸iWÈØ NSLRPv©«sv lgPÌsv¿RPvNRPV©SõƒRsv.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
